~DISENT

Please check out the latest package from Evoke - Unity [link]

Anyways, hello everyone & sorry for my lack of interaction lately. I've just been super busy, there a lot of comments I have to reply to and a lot of people I need to thank for favs and what not; I will get to you all eventually but in the mean time, THANK YOU, everyone. It's your support and encouragement that gives me reason to keep on doing what I do.

Merry Christmas & Happy Holidays Everyone


I hope you all got the presies you wanted & that you all have a wonderful & safe New Years

Hello everyone, sorry for my lack of interaction lately I've just been flat out with work; when you sit on a computer all day at work it's hard to find time to socialize on it as well
Anyway enough excuses I'll try to thank every one personally for the favs, as I always try to do, but it may take a while as I've been getting so many lately, thanks a lot every one, it means a lot to me.

I'm still working on a massive personal project, which I was hoping to finish a while ago, but I haven't touched for about a month. I just have very little desire to create much when i get home cause I've been doing it all day at work...I'm doing some pretty cool design & artwork at work atm & hopefully I'll be able to show some of that stuff soon. O.K take care everyone & much love from the beautiful Gold Coast Australia

OK rant time!

<sub>I am so sick of certain highly exposed (& others in general) manipulators here on dA getting false credit for their work. I'm referring to manipulators that use great stock & don't give credit or even let the people viewing their work know that the main element of their design is purely a stock photo with almost no manipulation done to it.

I've seen a lot of stock photos so whenever I see what looks like a nice manipulation which has had almost no work done to it, except that they chose great stock, I get very annoyed, especially when the artist isn't even crediting the stock provider & giving the impression they created all the work from scratch!

It just makes feel a little sick, I put a lot of time & effort into my work & I always make sure to credit the stock providers & to try to show new photoshoper's how & what I used to create my work, I don't give the false impression that I created the work from scratch without anyone else's work or resources.

I recently pulled someone on dA up on this & instead of fixing the problem & simply supplying a link to the stock used, the person in question actually called me a hater & went on to say the original stock he used sux (which it didn't) & that he created his "beautiful work" 100% himself even though every single element of his work was a manipulation. Now most passes by of this work wont recognize the stock & just assume he created the image in question, which is false & which not only gives this guy false praise but takes away recognition of the original photographer. This is wrong.

You people know who you are, sort your shit out before dA admin does!</sub>

What is it? Where does it come from? Can you give me some of yours?